Skip to main content

A clear human decision

Make coding-agent review decisions clear

Review the run, evidence, comments, and next action in one place. Then mark the work done, request follow-up, or start over.

Create a clear review decisionSee the review workflow

Why this matters

Human review should end with a recorded decision, not a vague promise that someone looked at the work.

Before and after

See what changes in the workflow.

Before alterac.ai

  • An agent says it is finished, but nobody knows who should act next.
  • Test results, code-review links, comments, and retry instructions live in different places.
  • The next attempt cannot tell accepted work from work that everyone stopped watching.

With alterac.ai

  • Submitted work opens in a dedicated Review workspace for that run.
  • The reviewer sees the summary, AI hand-off, code-review link, command, and comments together.
  • Mark done, Request follow-up work, and Start fresh each record a clear human decision.

What alterac.ai does

Connect the steps around your coding agents.

alterac.ai keeps the review status and next decision with the coding-agent run. People still inspect the repository, test the change, resolve code-review findings, and decide whether to merge.

  1. 01

    Receive the result

    The run returns a summary and AI hand-off with test results, risks, and an optional code-review link.

  2. 02

    Review everything together

    The reviewer reads the task, run output, history, and comments before choosing what happens next.

  3. 03

    Record the decision

    Mark the work done, request follow-up with comments, or start a separate fresh run.

  4. 04

    Choose what carries forward

    A follow-up receives the review history. Fresh work begins from the current task without that earlier feedback.

What stays in your control

Your team keeps the important decisions.

  • Requesting follow-up requires current review feedback, so the next agent is not sent back with an empty retry.
  • Start fresh keeps the reviewed run in history but leaves its feedback out of the new run's context.
  • alterac.ai records the decision. It does not judge code quality or replace repository review.

A good fit

When to consider this workflow

Choose this workflow when the team needs one review process for agent work but wants people to keep all technical judgment.

Not a fit

When another approach is better

  • Automatically accepting or merging agent work
  • Replacing repository code review or testing
  • Judging code quality or promising faster reviews
  • General project tracking or work outside software
  • Choosing which coding model, IDE, or coding agent to use
  • Generating code without managing repository work
  • A promise that work will ship faster, code will improve, or conflicts will disappear

Product details and evidence

Learn how it works and see the evidence.

These links explain the product behavior, show the exact limits, and share first-party evidence. Use the Docs guides when you are ready for setup steps and commands.

A clear human decision

Every submitted run ends with a recorded human decision and enough context to explain what happens next.

Create an alterac.ai account.

Create a clear review decisionSee the review workflow